2. Animal rights
2 minute read
Arguments for Animal testing
- Animals are used in important scientific research
- It is necessary to do medical tests on new drugs
- Animal testing helps to advance medical and scientific knowledge
- Many important medical discoveries involved experimentation on animals
- Researchers aim to minimize the suffering that animals experience
- Testing for the cosmetics industry is now banned in many countrie
Arguments against Animal Testing
- The benefits of research using animals do not justify the suffering caused
- There are alternative methods of research
- The lives of animals should be respected
- Humans have no moral right to do experiments on animals
Arguments for Vegetarianism
- Vegetarians do not eat foods that are produced by killing animals
- Many people choose a vegetarian diet for moral or health reasons
- A healthy diet is possible without eating meat
- It is unnecessary to kill animal for food
- A vegetarian diet may reduce the risk of disease like cancer
- Many people question the treatment of animals in factory farms
Arguments against Vegetarianism
- Vegetarians do not eat a balanced diet
- In many cultures, meat is the main ingredient in traditional meals
- Meat-eaters argue that animals are below humans in the food chain
- It is completely natural for us to kill them for food
- Our aim should be improve farming methods
- Farms should produce organic food
Positives of Zoos
- Zoos paly an important role in wildlife conservation
- They can help to protect endangered species
- Zoos allow scientists to study animals and their behavior
- Zoos are educational, interesting and fun
- Children, in particular, enjoy learning about animals
- Zoos provide job opportunities.
Negatives of Zoos
- Zoo animals are kept in artificial environments
- They are kept in cages or have limited space
- Zoo animals rely on humans
- They lose the freedom to hunt for food
- They best way to save endangered species is by protecting natural habitats.
- Some people believe that zoos are unethical
- Zoos exhibits animals with the aim of making money
- We have no right to use animals for entertainment and profit.
支持动物试验的论据
- 动物被用于重要的科学研究
- 对新药的医学试验是必要的
- 动物试验帮助促进医学和科学研究
- 很多重要的医学试验涉及到在动物上的试验
- 科研工作者旨在最小化动物经历的遭难
- 化妆行业的测试目前在很多国家已经被禁止
反对动物试验的论据
- 使用动物对研究的好处并不能证明其造成的遭难是合理的
- 有可替换的科研方法
- 动物的生命应该被尊敬
- 人类没有道德权去在动物身上做试验
支持素食主义的论据
- 素质主义者不吃杀死动物得到的食物
- 许多人选择素食主义的日常饮食是出于道德和健康的原因
- 不吃肉也可能有一个健康的日常饮食
- 杀死动物获取食物是没有必要的
- 一个素食主义的日常饮食或许会减少像癌症这样疾病的风险
- 许多人质疑工厂化工厂的动物得到的对待
反对素食主义的论据
- 素食主义者没有吃一个平衡的日常饮食
- 在许多文化里,肉是传统餐的主要原料
- 肉食者争论说在食物链中动物是在人类之下的
- 杀死它们获取食物对我们而言十分自然
- 我们的目标应该是提高耕作方法
- 农田应该生产有机食品
动物园的好处
- 动物园在野生生物保护方面发挥一个重要的作用
- 它们可以帮助保护濒危物种
- 动物园允许科学家研究动物及其它们的行为
- 动物园可以是有教育意义的、有趣的和好玩的
- 特别是孩子,喜欢学习有关动物
动物园的坏处
- 动物园的动物被关在人工环境里
- 它们被关在笼子里或者只有有限的空间
- 动物园的动物依赖人类
- 它们丧失的捕获食物的自由
- 最好的保护濒危物种的方法是保护自然栖息地
- 一些人认为动物园是不道德的
- 动物园为了赚钱而展览动物
- 我们没有权利为了娱乐和利益而使用动物
Last modified August 18, 2022: fix (7561da6)